| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
When it is time to execute recipes to update a target, they are
executed by invoking a new subshell for each line of the recipe,
unless the .ONESHELL special target is in effect
(see section Using One Shell) (In practice, make may
take shortcuts that do not affect the results.)
Please note: this implies that setting shell variables and
invoking shell commands such as cd that set a context local to
each process will not affect the following lines in the recipe.(2) If you want to use cd to affect the next statement,
put both statements in a single recipe line. Then make will
invoke one shell to run the entire line, and the shell will execute
the statements in sequence. For example:
foo : bar/lose
cd $(@D) && gobble $(@F) > ../$@
|
Here we use the shell AND operator (&&) so that if the
cd command fails, the script will fail without trying to invoke
the gobble command in the wrong directory, which could cause
problems (in this case it would certainly cause ‘../foo’ to be
truncated, at least).
| 5.3.1 Using One Shell | One shell for all lines in a recipe | |
| 5.3.2 Choosing the Shell | How make chooses the shell used
to run recipes.
|
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Sometimes you would prefer that all the lines in the recipe be passed
to a single invocation of the shell. There are generally two
situations where this is useful: first, it can improve performance in
makefiles where recipes consist of many command lines, by avoiding
extra processes. Second, you might want newlines to be included in
your recipe command (for example perhaps you are using a very
different interpreter as your SHELL). If the .ONESHELL
special target appears anywhere in the makefile then all
recipe lines for each target will be provided to a single invocation
of the shell. Newlines between recipe lines will be preserved. For
example:
.ONESHELL:
foo : bar/lose
cd $(@D)
gobble $(@F) > ../$@
|
would now work as expected even though the commands are on different recipe lines.
If .ONESHELL is provided, then only the first line of the
recipe will be checked for the special prefix characters (‘@’,
‘-’, and ‘+’). Subsequent lines will include the special
characters in the recipe line when the SHELL is invoked. If
you want your recipe to start with one of these special characters
you’ll need to arrange for them to not be the first characters on the
first line, perhaps by adding a comment or similar. For example, this
would be a syntax error in Perl because the first ‘@’ is removed
by make:
.ONESHELL:
SHELL = /usr/bin/perl
.SHELLFLAGS = -e
show :
@f = qw(a b c);
print "@f\n";
|
However, either of these alternatives would work properly:
.ONESHELL:
SHELL = /usr/bin/perl
.SHELLFLAGS = -e
show :
# Make sure "@" is not the first character on the first line
@f = qw(a b c);
print "@f\n";
|
or
.ONESHELL:
SHELL = /usr/bin/perl
.SHELLFLAGS = -e
show :
my @f = qw(a b c);
print "@f\n";
|
As a special feature, if SHELL is determined to be a
POSIX-style shell, the special prefix characters in “internal”
recipe lines will removed before the recipe is processed. This
feature is intended to allow existing makefiles to add the
.ONESHELL special target and still run properly without
extensive modifications. Since the special prefix characters are not
legal at the beginning of a line in a POSIX shell script this is not a
loss in functionality. For example, this works as expected:
.ONESHELL:
foo : bar/lose
@cd $(@D)
@gobble $(@F) > ../$@
|
Even with this special feature, however, makefiles with
.ONESHELL will behave differently in ways that could be
noticeable. For example, normally if any line in the recipe fails,
that causes the rule to fail and no more recipe lines are processed.
Under .ONESHELL a failure of any but the final recipe line will
not be noticed by make. You can modify .SHELLFLAGS to
add the -e option to the shell which will cause any failure
anywhere in the command line to cause the shell to fail, but this
could itself cause your recipe to behave differently. Ultimately you
may need to harden your recipe lines to allow them to work with
.ONESHELL.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The program used as the shell is taken from the variable SHELL.
If this variable is not set in your makefile, the program
‘/bin/sh’ is used as the shell. The argument(s) passed to the
shell are taken from the variable .SHELLFLAGS. The default
value of .SHELLFLAGS is -c normally, or -ec in
POSIX-conforming mode.
Unlike most variables, the variable SHELL is never set from the
environment. This is because the SHELL environment variable is
used to specify your personal choice of shell program for interactive
use. It would be very bad for personal choices like this to affect the
functioning of makefiles. See section Variables from the Environment.
Furthermore, when you do set SHELL in your makefile that value
is not exported in the environment to recipe lines that
make invokes. Instead, the value inherited from the user’s
environment, if any, is exported. You can override this behavior by
explicitly exporting SHELL (see section Communicating Variables to a Sub-make), forcing it to be
passed in the environment to recipe lines.
However, on MS-DOS and MS-Windows the value of SHELL in the
environment is used, since on those systems most users do not
set this variable, and therefore it is most likely set specifically to
be used by make. On MS-DOS, if the setting of SHELL is
not suitable for make, you can set the variable
MAKESHELL to the shell that make should use; if set it
will be used as the shell instead of the value of SHELL.
Choosing a shell in MS-DOS and MS-Windows is much more complex than on other systems.
On MS-DOS, if SHELL is not set, the value of the variable
COMSPEC (which is always set) is used instead.
The processing of lines that set the variable SHELL in Makefiles
is different on MS-DOS. The stock shell, ‘command.com’, is
ridiculously limited in its functionality and many users of make
tend to install a replacement shell. Therefore, on MS-DOS, make
examines the value of SHELL, and changes its behavior based on
whether it points to a Unix-style or DOS-style shell. This allows
reasonable functionality even if SHELL points to
‘command.com’.
If SHELL points to a Unix-style shell, make on MS-DOS
additionally checks whether that shell can indeed be found; if not, it
ignores the line that sets SHELL. In MS-DOS, GNU make
searches for the shell in the following places:
SHELL. For
example, if the makefile specifies ‘SHELL = /bin/sh’, make
will look in the directory ‘/bin’ on the current drive.
PATH variable, in order.
In every directory it examines, make will first look for the
specific file (‘sh’ in the example above). If this is not found,
it will also look in that directory for that file with one of the known
extensions which identify executable files. For example ‘.exe’,
‘.com’, ‘.bat’, ‘.btm’, ‘.sh’, and some others.
If any of these attempts is successful, the value of SHELL will
be set to the full pathname of the shell as found. However, if none of
these is found, the value of SHELL will not be changed, and thus
the line that sets it will be effectively ignored. This is so
make will only support features specific to a Unix-style shell if
such a shell is actually installed on the system where make runs.
Note that this extended search for the shell is limited to the cases
where SHELL is set from the Makefile; if it is set in the
environment or command line, you are expected to set it to the full
pathname of the shell, exactly as things are on Unix.
The effect of the above DOS-specific processing is that a Makefile that
contains ‘SHELL = /bin/sh’ (as many Unix makefiles do), will work
on MS-DOS unaltered if you have e.g. ‘sh.exe’ installed in some
directory along your PATH.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] |
This document was generated by Davide Tacchella on November 3, 2010 using texi2html 1.82.